fun revisited
I read a lot of on-line news stuff for fun. I blog for fun. I make my website better (and sometimes worse) for fun. I like to messs with stuff for fun. I challenge people for fun (and because I think that questioning our beliefs is a good way to be better people -- even if we question and reaffirm), but it's also fun in a sometimes bewildering uncomfortable way. I put myself in uncomfortable positions for fun -- I suppose that's kind of weird, but I enjoy testing myself that way to see if I can adapt or overcome the discomfort; and I'm not talking about physical pain (although a good workout hurts and then feels good), but social situations, emotional situations, etc. Of course, there are still situations I avoid because of discomfort. I guess I feel that avoidance of something sometimes leads to insularism, which in turn sometimes leads to intolerance. I also like to hang with friends for fun, although I feel like I get more out of it than "fun" -- friends tend to support me as much as I support them, and sometimes it's not really fun, but I still like to do it. I play with my dog for fun (and out of a sense of love and the obligation of responsibility).
So, do I have an integrated sense of fun, or just a narrow definition?
dunno.
1 Comments:
I was thinking about this for a while. Your take on what you do for fun is quite detailed and insightful.
I suspect a 9-5er would not have had to think so hard: fun is whatever's not at work for most. I get the feeling your rhythm is not 9-5, but more scholarly, eh? Hence the more integrated life.
My HS German teacher once told us that when a European asks, "What do you do?" the implication is "for fun," not "for a living." He also told us to ask permission to shower every day, and that putting your elbows on the table was a ghastly breach of etiquette, both of which were somewhat off as they were based on particularly nutty German individuals. So I'm not sure if he's right.
Post a Comment
<< Home